On 09/18/2011 05:24 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2011-09-18 17:18, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> What about: >> >> diff --git a/ksrc/nucleus/shadow.c b/ksrc/nucleus/shadow.c >> index 21cc191..7fe44a1 100644 >> --- a/ksrc/nucleus/shadow.c >> +++ b/ksrc/nucleus/shadow.c >> @@ -2756,9 +2756,12 @@ static inline void do_setsched_event(struct >> task_struct *p, int priority) >> union xnsched_policy_param param; >> struct xnsched *sched; >> >> - if (!thread || p->policy != SCHED_FIFO) >> + if (!thread || (p->policy != SCHED_FIFO && p->policy != SCHED_OTHER)) >> return; >> >> + if (p->policy == SCHED_OTHER) >> + priority = 0; >> + >> /* >> * Linux's priority scale is a subset of the core pod's >> * priority scale, so there is no need to bound the priority > > No other policies can be issued against the Linux part of a shadow? Then > it's OK. I just don't recall the details here ATM. > > Jan >
This should be OK, according to the comment: * BIG FAT WARNING: Change of scheduling parameters from the * Linux side are propagated only to threads that belong to * the Xenomai RT scheduling class. Threads from other classes * are remain unaffected, since we could not map this * information 1:1 between Linux and Xenomai. */ -- Gilles. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core