Philippe Gerum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 16.11.2005 13:58:45:
> ...
>
> Ok, this kind of stuff should always be designed with the brain turned on. Now
> that I have eventually found the power switch, I'm going to fix the
> printk issue
> in the Adeos core along the following lines. The code below basically reworks
> your proposal. The construct is still a bit hairy, but
> unfortunately, we cannot
> just go for using a plain atomic compare-and-exchange op in the virq handler,
> since we need to serialize its activation among all CPUs - sigh...
> We also get rid
> of PPRINTK - which is redundant - in the same move.
Yep, this implementation looks at least sane to me now.
> ...
> --
>
> Philippe.
>
---
Dmitry
- Re: [Xenomai-help] Blocki... Ignacio García Pérez
- Re: [Xenomai-help] Blocking r... Dmitry Adamushko
- Re: [Xenomai-help] Blocking reads ... Gilles Chanteperdrix
- Re: [Xenomai-help] Blocking r... Dmitry Adamushko
- Re: [Xenomai-help] Blocki... Gilles Chanteperdrix
- Re: [Xenomai-help] Blocki... Dmitry Adamushko
- Re: [Xenomai-help] Blocki... Ignacio García Pérez
- Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [X... Dmitry Adamushko
- Re: [Xenomai-help] Blocking r... Dmitry Adamushko
- Re: [Xenomai-help] Blocking reads from pipes Dmitry Adamushko
- Re: [Xenomai-help] printk Dmitry Adamushko
