[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
> Having a means to avoid that your critical process gets killed
> accidentally because some uncritical one decided to suck up all
> system resources is, IMO, a very legitimate use case. On 2.6, where
> there is no CONFIG_OOM_KILLER, you can play with /proc/<pid>/oom_adj
> and make your process "unattractive" to the OOM killer (set to -17).
> On older kernels you also had to include any parent processes in this
> protection. I think this was fixed meanwhile.      
> 
> But I wonder why there should be no effect of CONFIG_OOM_KILLER on
> 2.4. 
> Forgot to replay the updated kernel binaries?

Well double checked: no. At least if my .config in the linux kernel
directory is not magically updated after compiling the kernel. BTW: I
could not find that option in the make menuconfig configuration. Maybe
it is hidden somewhere in a submenu, but at least in the .config file it
is definetly disabled.


Best regards,

Daniel Schnell.

_______________________________________________
Xenomai-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help

Reply via email to