Stephen Bryant wrote:
> On 22 July 2010 08:54, Gilles Chanteperdrix <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Stephen Bryant wrote:
>>> On 21 July 2010 14:06, Gilles Chanteperdrix
>>> <[email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Stephen Bryant wrote:
>>> > I've had a look at dmesg, but cannot find any references to SMI -
>> what
>>> > should I be looking for?
>>>
>>> What is described in the TROUBLESHOOTING file.
>>>
>>>
>>> I have tried disabling the SMI workaround, ensuring that SMI detection
>>> is not disabled, and logging the kernel output (setting the kernel log
>>> level to 8 in grub and sending the output to the serial port to be
>>> picked up by another machine). The troubleshooting file states that I
>>> should see "Xenomai: Intel chipset found and SMI workaround not
>>> enabled, you may encounter high interrupt latencies." in this output,
>>> however this does not occur - I am using an Intel Core 2 Duo but with
>>> SMP disabled, if this has any relevance.
>> The SMI detection/workaround is based on the chipset you have. If your
>> chipset is an ICH10, Stefan posted a patch a few days ago. If it is
>> another one, then please send us the result of lspci -vv on your target.
>>
>
> It seems to be ICH8, so the result is attached,
Please try with the following patch:
diff --git a/ksrc/arch/x86/smi.c b/ksrc/arch/x86/smi.c
index 2116899..a547e88 100644
--- a/ksrc/arch/x86/smi.c
+++ b/ksrc/arch/x86/smi.c
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ static struct pci_device_id rthal_smi_pci_tbl[] = {
{PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH6_2)},
{PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH7_0)},
{PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH7_1)},
+ {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH8_0)},
{PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH8_4)},
{0,},
};
--
Gilles.
_______________________________________________
Xenomai-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
