Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Prakash A S wrote:
>>     prakash srinivasan wrote:
>>     >>>>> printf(TOTAL LOOP TIMING=%ld us\n",
>>     >>>>> (long)((rt_timer_ticks2ns(end-start))/1000);
>>     >>>> What does: printf(TOTAL LOOP TIMING=%lld us\n",
>>     >>>> rt_timer_ticks2ns(end-start)/1000); report.
>>     >>> TOTAL LOOP TIMING = 5377070 us In this case, the (unsigned)
>>     >>> (long) (long)tart returns 1069623206 and (unsigned) (long)
>>     >>> (long)end returns 2151726697
>>     >> Are you happy with that result? Did really pass approx. 5 seconds
>>     > between start and end?
>>
>>     Could you format your mails correctly to make them readable? Use text,
>>     not HTML, truncate at 72 characters, and use > as a quotation mark,
>>     meaning that one '>' is the sign that you quote someone, two '>' is you
>>     quoting someone who quoted someone else, etc... I am really sorry to
>>     have to tell you about this, this is really basic knowledge of the
>>     netiquette, we should not have to tell you about it.
>>
>>     > Definitely not and I am not confident about this output. Coz in this
>>     > loop period I am sending datas from client to the server. Visibly
>>     > noted that the server is getting all the datas within a second. So I
>>     > am not sure the 5 sec is the right output. I just like to know all
>>     > the above conversions are correct? and is it ok that the start ticks
>>     > can be more than the end ticks?
>>
>>     The result of rt_timer_read is a long long, so, if you cast it to an
>>     unsigned, you loose the most significant bits. So, the result is totally
>>     meaningless. This again, is basic knowledge of the C language, we should
>>     not have to explain.
>>
>>     Your bug report is quite insufficient, we do not even know what version
>>     of Xenomai you use, maybe you are reporting a bug which has been solved
>>     a long time ago. Neither do we know what version of Linux and of the
>>     Adoes patch you use, or the contents of your .config file. We do not
>>     have a self-contained example that we can run to try and reproduce your
>>     issue.
>>
>>     So if you want some answers, please give us the means to answer you.
>>
>>
>> As an community person I AGREED with what you pointed out. My main mistake 
>> was I subscribed the
>>
>> mailing list with an useless mailID. Now I changed my mail ID. Surely you 
>> will get the proper 
>> quote in future. In between the mail change, I lost the continuation for 
>> this topic and did not
>> get this reply mail to my new mail ID. Simply copy and pasted the last mail 
>> from the archive.  
> 
> We still receive HTML.
> 
>> Obviously I should improve my C language skills.
>>
>> I am using linux kernel 2.6.30.8 on Ubuntu 8.04,
>> Adeos-ipipe-2.6.30.8-x86-2.4-09.patch and Xenomai-2.5.3
> 
> What about the kernel configuration and self-contained test exhibiting
> the behaviour you do not understand?

Prakash, ping?

-- 
                                            Gilles.

_______________________________________________
Xenomai-help mailing list
Xenomai-help@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help

Reply via email to