Henri Roosen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was pleased to read on the Linux Kernel Mailing List Greg's message
> about Linux stable kernel release procedure changes, that the longterm
> supported stable kernels will be made more explicit by getting the
> 'longterm' name.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/12/2/388
>
> We are embedding Linux in products and therefore those longterm
> kernels are very valuable for us. We chose 2.6.32 kernel because of
> that a while ago.
>
> However, unfortunately there is no Ipipe patch that applies cleanly on
> the latest 2.6.32.26 stable, nor is there an ARM version.
>
> It would be great if Xenomai would also recognize this need and would
> do some kind of 'long term' support for the Ipipe for the longterm
> kernels. I understand maintaining the Ipipe is a lot of work.
> Personally I think it would be an option to only support the longterm
> kernels...
>
> What do the Xenomai/Ipipe developers think?
Well, 2.6.35 is also a long term version. Maintaining all the long term
versions is a lot of work (it takes time to simply validate a patch for
every new release). So, we probably can not maintain support for all the
long term versions, we would probably have to pick one.
Since the I-pipe patch for ARM skips even versions (in order to reduce
the time spent issuing I-pipe patches), and since it is more recent, I
would rather go for 2.6.35.
--
Gilles.
_______________________________________________
Xenomai-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
