Herrera-Bendezu, Luis wrote:
>> From: Gilles Chanteperdrix [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 11:26 AM
>> To: Herrera-Bendezu, Luis
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] [Xenomai -help] User space access to DMA memory
>>
>> Herrera-Bendezu, Luis wrote:
>>>> From: Gilles Chanteperdrix [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 8:35 AM
>>>> To: Herrera-Bendezu, Luis
>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] [Xenomai -help] User space access to DMA memory
>>>>
>>>> Herrera-Bendezu, Luis wrote:
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Gilles Chanteperdrix [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 6:28 PM
>>>>>> To: Herrera-Bendezu, Luis
>>>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] [Xenomai -help] User space access to DMA
>>>>>> memory
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>>>>> Herrera-Bendezu, Luis wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 01/05/2011 5:29 PM Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Steven A. Falco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 01/05/2011 04:33 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Ok. Could you try to do the same operation with the native API? You
>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>> have to pass H_SHARED | H_DMA | H_NONCACHED as flags to rt_heap_create
>>>>>>>>> to get the same effect as pci_dma_alloc_coherent.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just to see if the error lies in RTDM implementation or in Xenomai
>>>>>>>>> generic code.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (...)
>>>>>>> What about the other thing I asked you to test?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ping? Any news about this test?
>>>>> rt_heap_create() with flags H_SHARED | H_DMA | H_NONCACHED report -EINVAL.
>>>>> Documentation indicates that H_NONCACHE is not compatible with H_DMA.
>>>> Right, supporting H_NONCACHED | H_DMA would mean that we would have to
>>>> use kmalloc/get_free_pages then establish a non-cached mapping in
>>>> kernel-space with vm_map_ram.
>>>>
>>>> Could you try with H_NONCACHED, but without H_DMA? Of course, the
>>>> mapping can not be used for DMA, as it will probably not be physically
>>>> contiguous, but at least you can try whether accessing in user-space a
>>>> non-cached mapping works.
>>> It does work but unless an external unit writes to heap memory it would
>>> be difficult to verify that the non-cached memory actually works, i.e.
>>> access from user space gets expected value(s).
>> I am quite confident this works.
>>
>>>> In any case, we see a defect in the RTDM interface here: we can not ask
>>>> the mapping to be mapped non-cacheable, which somewhat defeats the
>>>> purpose of pci_alloc_consistent. I do not know enough the powerpc
>>>> architecture to know whether this could be the cause of your issue (the
>>>> same physical area mapped twice, once cached, once non-cached). However,
>>>> on the ARM architecture, for instance, it is bad.
>>>>
>>> Let me summarize the ideas discussed so far to allocate consistent memory
>>> suitable for DMA and corresponding mapping to user space:
>>> * rt_heap cannot be created with both H_NONCACHED and H_DMA. But it is
>>> automatically mapped to user space with rt_heap_bind().
>>>
>>> A solution can be to allocate heap with H_SHARED | H_DMA, somehow
>>> get bus address of single block of memory (rt_heap { sba } ?) to
>>> used for DMA operations.
>> The test with rt_heap was just a test to have a comparison between
>> xnheap code and rtdm_mmap. But we may indeed want to fix mmappable
>> xnheaps later on.
>>
>>> * RTDM interface rtdm_mmap/unmap cannot handle non-cacheable memory.
>>>
>>> A solution can be to allocate GFP_DMA memory with kmalloc(), use
>>> rtdm_mmap to map to user space. Programmatically make memory
>>> consistent before/after DMA transfer to/from external unit, e.g.
>>> dma_sync_single_for_device()/dma_sync_single_for_cpu(). This is
>>> similar to what streaming DMA mappings do.
>>>
>>> * Ideally, it should be possible to take memory allocated from
>>> dma_alloc_coherent()/pci_alloc_consistent() and mapped it to
>>> user space using rtdm_mmap().
>> To check that the non-cacheable mapping is indeed the problem, here is a
>> patch which adds the possibility to add non-cacheable mappings:
>>
>> diff --git a/ksrc/skins/rtdm/drvlib.c b/ksrc/skins/rtdm/drvlib.c
>> index 3495e63..ec0ddae 100644
>> --- a/ksrc/skins/rtdm/drvlib.c
>> +++ b/ksrc/skins/rtdm/drvlib.c
>> @@ -1791,6 +1791,7 @@ void rtdm_nrtsig_pend(rtdm_nrtsig_t *nrt_sig);
>>
>> #if defined(CONFIG_XENO_OPT_PERVASIVE) || defined(DOXYGEN_CPP)
>> struct rtdm_mmap_data {
>> + int noncached;
>> void *src_vaddr;
>> phys_addr_t src_paddr;
>> struct vm_operations_struct *vm_ops;
>> @@ -1815,6 +1816,9 @@ static int rtdm_mmap_buffer(struct file *filp,
>> struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> maddr = vma->vm_start;
>> size = vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start;
>>
>> + if (mmap_data->noncached)
>> + vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_noncached(vma->vm_page_prot);
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
>> /* Catch vmalloc memory (vaddr is 0 for I/O mapping) */
>> if ((vaddr >= VMALLOC_START) && (vaddr < VMALLOC_END)) {
>> @@ -1975,6 +1979,24 @@ int rtdm_mmap_to_user(rtdm_user_info_t *user_info,
>> void *vm_private_data)
>> {
>> struct rtdm_mmap_data mmap_data = {
>> + .noncached = 0,
>> + .src_vaddr = src_addr,
>> + .src_paddr = 0,
>> + .vm_ops = vm_ops,
>> + .vm_private_data = vm_private_data
>> + };
>> +
>> + return rtdm_do_mmap(user_info, &mmap_data, len, prot, pptr);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int rtdm_mmap_noncached_to_user(rtdm_user_info_t *user_info,
>> + void *src_addr, size_t len,
>> + int prot, void **pptr,
>> + struct vm_operations_struct *vm_ops,
>> + void *vm_private_data)
>> +{
>> + struct rtdm_mmap_data mmap_data = {
>> + .noncached = 1,
>> .src_vaddr = src_addr,
>> .src_paddr = 0,
>> .vm_ops = vm_ops,
>> @@ -2043,6 +2065,7 @@ int rtdm_iomap_to_user(rtdm_user_info_t *user_info,
>> void *vm_private_data)
>> {
>> struct rtdm_mmap_data mmap_data = {
>> + .noncached = 0,
>> .src_vaddr = NULL,
>> .src_paddr = src_addr,
>> .vm_ops = vm_ops,
>>
>> Simply call rtdm_mmap_noncached_to_user instead of rtdm_mmap_to_user.
>>
>
> Get same kernel panic error as before with this patch. I need to look closer
> at what are the memory allocation functions used by pci_ and dma_.
Could you try rtdm_iomap_to_user (but beware, pass the physical address
returned by pointer by pci_alloc_consistent)? virt_to_page, or __pa will
not work with vmalloc/ioremap addresses. And pci_alloc_consistent
probably returns a vmalloc mapping due to the fact that the mapping
needs to be non-cacheable, which will happen if your powerpc does not
support cache snooping, and define CONFIG_NOT_COHERENT_CACHE.
--
Gilles.
_______________________________________________
Xenomai-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
