On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperd...@xenomai.org> wrote: > On 09/05/2011 07:14 PM, Henri Roosen wrote: >> Hi Gilles, >> >> Unfortunately I didn't find the time to test this release yet. I'm >> just wondering if there is a fix for this problem in the 2.6.0 >> release: https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-core/2011-05/msg00028.html > > This one is fixed, a bit differently, since we fixed the ppd handling so > that the ppd is valid up to the end of a process. > >> >> We are using the auto-relax patches on top of 2.5.6 for a long time >> now. We found issues with it regarding auto-relax tasks that were not >> being auto-relaxed anymore. Philippe made patches for that, see >> https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-help/2011-03/msg00161.html. > > Philippe's patches for rt_task_send/receive/reply should have been > merged too. > >> However, locally I reverted those two patches because these introduced >> a memory leak in xnheap; I could only do rt_task_create() >> rt_task_delete() for 1024 times ;-). I thought that was the discussion >> of >> https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-core/2011-05/msg00028.html at that >> time and I don't recall a proper fix for it was provided. But I might >> have missed it... > > This looks related to the ppd issue as well, in which case, it should > have been fixed too. > > It would be nice if you could test the release and tell us whether you > still have these issues. >
I've now tested the issues on the Xenomai 2.6.0-rc1 release. Both issues don't occur. Thanks, Henri > > -- > Gilles. > _______________________________________________ Xenomai-help mailing list Xenomai-help@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help