On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 14:35 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 13:10 +0200, Ronny Meeus wrote: > > Hello > > > > We have ported a large pSOS based application to an Embedded Linux > > environment using Xenomai. > > A more or less stable version is running at this moment. > > > > The application is not a real-time application at all, we basically > > selected Xenomai for its pSOS interface. > > Since our application uses also native Linux calls (for example socket > > communication), we start to see some strange behavior. > > Example: lower priority tasks are running in the xenomai domain while > > higher priority tasks, sending data on a socket for example, have to > > wait until all processing in the Xenomai domain is completed. > > > > My feeling is that the Solo project would be better for us. > > As far as I understand, this is just a thin layer on top of Linux, > > purely running in user space that also offers the pSOS interface. > > Is my understanding correct? > > Yes. > > > > > If it is, I would think that the socket issue described above will be > > automatically solved since there will only be 1 scheduler (the Linux > > one) and it will respect the thread/task priorities. > > > > True, but in purely Linux native mode, note that your app would be > restricted to use VxWorks priorities between 0 and 98 inclusive.
0 and 97 inclusive, the two highest priority levels are reserved for internal use. > > > What is the status of this project? > > > > Regards, > > Ronny > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xenomai-help mailing list > > Xenomai-help@gna.org > > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help > -- Philippe. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-help mailing list Xenomai-help@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
