On 09/11/2012 05:56 PM, Gernot Hillier wrote: > Hi there! > > While testing ipipe-core3.2 on an SMP x86 machine, I found a reproducible > kernel BUG after some seconds after starting irqbalance: > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/ipipe.c:592! > invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP > CPU 0 > Modules linked in: des_generic md4 i7core_edac psmouse nls_cp437 edac_core > cifs serio_raw joydev raid10 raid456 async_pq async_xor xor async_memcpy > async_raid6_recov usbhid hid mpt2sas scsi_transport_sas raid_class igb > raid6_pq async_tx raid1 raid0 multipath linear > > Pid: 0, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.2.21-9-xenomai #3 Siemens AG Healthcare > Sector MARS 2.1/X8DTH > RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8101edec>] [<ffffffff8101edec>] > __ipipe_handle_irq+0x1bc/0x1d0 > RSP: 0018:ffffffff8177bbe0 EFLAGS: 00010086 > RAX: 000000000000d880 RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 0000000000000092 > RDX: ffffffffffffffdf RSI: ffffffff8177bc18 RDI: ffffffff8177bbf8 > RBP: ffffffff8177bc00 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 > R10: ffff880624ebaef8 R11: 000000000029fbc4 R12: 000000000000d880 > R13: ffffffff8177bbf8 R14: ffff880624e00000 R15: ffff880624e0d880 > FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880624e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b > CR2: 00007f452a2efb80 CR3: 0000000c114d3000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > Process swapper/0 (pid: 0, threadinfo ffffffff81778000, task ffffffff81787020) > Stack: > 0000000000000000 ffffffff8177bfd8 0000000000000063 ffff880624e1f9a8 > ffffffff8177bca8 ffffffff815a44dd ffffffff8177bc18 ffffffff8177bca8 > 00000000815a373b 000000000029fbc4 ffff880624eba570 0000000000000000 > Call Trace: > [<ffffffff815a44dd>] irq_move_cleanup_interrupt+0x5d/0x90 > [<ffffffff815a6649>] ? call_softirq+0x19/0x30 > [<ffffffff810043d5>] do_softirq+0xc5/0x100 > [<ffffffff81050955>] irq_exit+0xd5/0xf0 > [<ffffffff815a6e1f>] do_IRQ+0x6f/0x100 > [<ffffffff815a6db0>] ? __entry_text_end+0x5/0x5 > [<ffffffff8101f4d3>] __ipipe_do_IRQ+0x83/0xa0 > [<ffffffff8101f4d9>] ? __ipipe_do_IRQ+0x89/0xa0 > [<ffffffff810b7aaa>] __ipipe_dispatch_irq_fast+0x16a/0x170 > [<ffffffff810b87b9>] __ipipe_dispatch_irq+0xe9/0x210 > [<ffffffff8101eca1>] __ipipe_handle_irq+0x71/0x1d0 > [<ffffffff8159bae0>] common_interrupt+0x60/0x81 > [<ffffffff8101f3c4>] ? __ipipe_halt_root+0x34/0x50 > [<ffffffff8101f3b7>] ? __ipipe_halt_root+0x27/0x50 > [<ffffffff8100b146>] default_idle+0x66/0x1a0 > [<ffffffff810020cf>] cpu_idle+0xaf/0x100 > [<ffffffff8157ec22>] rest_init+0x72/0x80 > [<ffffffff81aeacca>] start_kernel+0x3b4/0x3bf > [<ffffffff81aea321>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x131/0x135 > [<ffffffff81aea456>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x131/0x138 > Code: ff ff 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 83 a0 98 06 00 00 fe 4c 89 ee bf 20 00 00 00 e8 > 63 83 09 00 e9 f6 fe ff ff be 01 00 00 00 e9 ab fe ff ff <0f> 0b 66 90 eb fc > 66 66 66 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 > RIP [<ffffffff8101edec>] __ipipe_handle_irq+0x1bc/0x1d0 > RSP <ffffffff8177bbe0> > > This seems to be caused by a missing entry for IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR > in the per_cpu array vector_irq[]. > > I found that ipipe_init_vector_irq() (which used to add the needed > entry) was factored out from arch/x86/kernel/ipipe.c. This likely > happened when porting from 2.6.38 to 3.1 - at least I can still see the > code in ipipe-2.6.38-x86 and missed it in ipipe-core3.1 (and didn't find > any x86-branch in-between).
If I understand correctly, ipipe_init_vector_irq is no longer needed because the I-pipe core uses ipipe_apic_vector_irq for vectors above FIRST_SYSTEM_VECTOR. All system vectors are above this limit... except IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR. So, your patch is correct. Another one which should work is to handle the special case IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_IRQ in __ipipe_handle_irq as well. -- Gilles. _______________________________________________ Xenomai mailing list Xenomai@xenomai.org http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai