On 2013-01-16 16:30, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2013-01-16 16:25, Philippe Gerum wrote: >> On 01/16/2013 04:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> Hi Philippe, >>> >>> a first heads-up, maybe you have an idea before I start debugging: That >>> patch causes troubles when our application shuts down. The main thread >>> hangs like this, unkillable: >>> >> >> It looks like the LO_WAKEUP_REQ virtual interrupt does not reach the >> handler. > > Hmm, lostage queue overflow? We used to carry some detection patch (to > make the existing detector unconditional), not sure what happened to it. > Will dig in this direction first.
No queue overflow. And you can immediately trigger it on x86-64 with latency e.g. I have this now in my VM, but a different bug on real HW is calling which has higher prio. Will come back to this ASAP. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux _______________________________________________ Xenomai mailing list Xenomai@xenomai.org http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
