On 2013-02-06 13:31, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 02/06/2013 01:28 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> 
>> On 2013-02-06 13:18, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> On 02/06/2013 11:20 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Gilles,
>>>>
>>>> I just realized that there is now a 8253 clocksource in core-3.4+. How
>>>> does this work together with Xenomai's TSC emulation via the 8254 in the
>>>> x86 hal_32? Xenomai reprograms the PIT in rthal_setup_8254_tsc - is this
>>>> harmless?
>>>>
>>>> I came across this while trying to get rid of Xenomai's "depends on
>>>> !INPUT_PCSPKR" to avoid that circular Kbuild dependency.
>>>
>>>
>>> This emulation replaces Xenomai's TSC emulation when the kernel boots on
>>> a cpu without a TSC: the detection is made at run-time instead of
>>> compilation time using self-modifying code (this in order to be able to
>>> build Debian kernels which boots with any configuration).
>>
>> Hmm, that's for the kernel. But what prevents rthal_setup_8254_tsc from
>> being executed in addition? I'm currently a bit lost in the #ifdefs.
> 
> 
> rthal_setup_8254_tsc is not called.
> 
>>
>>> There is no
>>> reason to keep the compilation-time dependency on !INPUT_PCSPKR with
>>> I-pipe core, as now the pc speaker is disabled at run-time too.
>>> Unfortunately, I could not find how to arrange the Kconfig either.
>>
>> As this is only about practically unsupported combinations of Xenomai
>> (2.6.x) and I-pipe (for kernel 2.6.x) on x86, we could move from a
>> configure-time to a build-time detection (#ifdef CONFIG_INPUT_PCSPKR ->
>> BUILD_BUG()).
> 
> 
> There is already a run-time detection which simply does not declare the
> PC speaker platform device when there is no tsc.

That's for core-3.4+, but not for older kernels. If we are fine with
ignoring them, I'll just write a patch to remove that Kconfig dependency.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

_______________________________________________
Xenomai mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai

Reply via email to