El Dilluns, 26 de gener de 2015, a les 13:08:24, Gilles Chanteperdrix va escriure: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 07:43:21PM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > El Diumenge, 25 de gener de 2015, a les 19:10:16, Philippe Gerum va escriure: > > > On 01/25/2015 12:14 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > > > But I was thinking in performance aspects comparing a system with > > > > cobalt > > > > vs a system with mercury. > > > > > > Yes, but the results are now outdated (2011). This said, such benchmark > > > hardly reflected a use case. It was more a Xenomai 2.6.x vs 3.x analysis > > > of basic mechanisms (event notification, serialization, buffer exchange > > > etc) for measuring the impact of moving most of the real-time API > > > implementation to user-space, only keeping the core resource management > > > in kernel space. It proved to be positive. > > > > > > Mercury vs Cobalt was only a by-product of those tests, specifically on > > > x86_32. > > > > After this thread, I think more firmly that the libs should be renamed in > > the manner that they could be co-installed in the same root, standard > > places. > > > > Please upstream, could you think about it? > > This is a decision that upstream should not impose to all users.
Interesting sentence. You are developing a new version with an step forward. You have reworked libraries and for instance libxenomai, libnative, librtdm doesn't exists in Xenomai-3. Also you have introduced new ones (libalchemy, libcobalt, libcopperplate, libtrank. You have developed xenomai in two main group of libraries (or use a cobalt kernel or a mercury kernel) and are you saying that you cannot impose to all users a suffix or something that the users could have both version co- installed in standards places in their systems? > Only users with your specific needs should do what you want. Maybe I'm wrong. But after reading this thread I understood that to have a kernel with both patches (i-pipe and preempt_rt) and, I understand, Xenomai-3 with the two versions could be a very interesting system to work on. For instance, I'm in the robotics field, and after that mails I thought that it could be a good solution that fit the cases where you have several loops, with several rates with different importance. > And > in fact, I believe simply using the configure script options, it is > possible to install libraries in different directories. Maybe even > the --program* options apply to libraries too. Not really. It's nice if you a have a package. Leopold -- -- Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA Catalonia ------------------------------------- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/attachments/20150126/f1f68980/attachment.sig> _______________________________________________ Xenomai mailing list Xenomai@xenomai.org http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
