On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 06:49:33PM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 06:44:06PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > On 2015-07-02 18:30, Philippe Gerum wrote: > > > On 07/02/2015 05:39 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > >> On 2015-07-02 17:24, Philippe Gerum wrote: > > >>> On 07/02/2015 05:20 PM, git repository hosting wrote: > > >>>> Module: xenomai-jki > > >>>> Branch: for-forge > > >>>> Commit: 99736c29a21a5e5536f8db9e580fd11cdb0eb0f2 > > >>>> URL: > > >>>> http://git.xenomai.org/?p=xenomai-jki.git;a=commit;h=99736c29a21a5e5536f8db9e580fd11cdb0eb0f2 > > >>>> > > >>>> Author: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> > > >>>> Date: Thu Jul 2 17:12:39 2015 +0200 > > >>>> > > >>>> cobalt/kernel: Remove unused mode parameter from COBALT_SYSCALL > > >>> > > >>> We want to keep this. At some point, maybe, we will be able to use this > > >>> information to instrument the code with calling context guards, or as > > >>> the source of the mode data in the syscall table. Today, it's at least > > >>> useful inline documentation, without having to browse the table. > > >> > > >> This only makes sense when cobalt_sysmodes can be generated from it. > > >> Currently it isn't, and I bet there are already plenty of > > >> inconsistencies, minimizing the value captured via COBALT_SYSCALL > > >> massively. So we should either get rid of cobalt_sysmodes or of that > > >> parameter. > > >> > > > > > > "currently" is the point. If you feel implementing either aspects, i.e. > > > automatic tagging of the current context when traversing a cobalt call > > > based on the mode in the syscall macro, or generating the table data > > > based on the info, please do. If you feel fixing any consistency between > > > the two mode specs proving your bet right, please do as well. But for > > > now, I won't pick that commit. > > > > The approach of using COBALT_SYSCALL to define the mode only works if > > that is also the only place to define it. Let's see first if/how that > > can be achieved. > > That can be achieved by getting the macro to adding data in a > special section, then use that section as the syscall table with
Use that section to build the syscall table. Or sort it. The section can not be used directoy, the syscalls are not in the right order. -- Gilles. https://click-hack.org _______________________________________________ Xenomai mailing list Xenomai@xenomai.org http://xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai