On 07/23/2015 11:08 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2015-07-23 10:40, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> On 07/21/2015 04:54 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2015-07-21 14:51, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>>> On 07/21/2015 02:27 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>> Hi Philippe,
>>>>>
>>>>> just a heads up, I'll try to address this later:
>>>>>
>>>>> I received a report that include/rtdm/uapi/rtdm.h contains some data
>>>>> structures that are used between the kernel and the userspace library
>>>>> (so not directly by applications) and are not compatible with
>>>>> 32-on-64-bit (compat) scenarios. We should probably promote anything
>>>>> that is longer on 64-bit to that size, unconditionally. As this affects
>>>>> the ABI, it should be fixed before 3.0 release, ideally.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That would require to fix up the client drivers (setsockopt, getsockopt
>>>> typically). Ok, I'll have a look when I'm done with testing the blackfin
>>>> port.
>>>
>>> Indeed. Just realized that there are already compat structs for the
>>> socket stuff. However, and that was what our user stumbled over, there
>>> is none for _rtdm_mmap_request. But that should be really internal, right?
>>>
>>
>> mmap() has the compat thunk for 32<->64 bit conversion already, so this
>> is ok.
> 
> Ok... Rechecking the bug report here, the issue is rather the case that
> off_t becomes 64 bit when defining -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 for your
> userland. We are apparently required to account for that case as well.
> 

Ok, so let's move the offset member to loff_t and compat_loff_t in the
mmap request descriptors, that should do the trick.

-- 
Philippe.

_______________________________________________
Xenomai mailing list
[email protected]
http://xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai

Reply via email to