On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Philippe Gerum <[email protected]> wrote: > On 02/04/2017 09:19 AM, Ran Shalit wrote: >> Hello, >> >> It is said in documentation: >> >> "The key issue is with the number of CPU cores actually running >> real-time threads and receiving interrupts from real-time sources, not >> with the overall number of cores on line on the target hardware. >> Because the Cobalt co-kernel does not share any lock with the regular >> Linux kernel when dealing with real-time activities, a 16-way server >> pinning such activities on not more than four of the available cores >> would still deliver good performances in a Cobalt-based dual kernel >> configuration." >> >> We plan to use xenomai, >> but the cpu (Atom) is only a single core. >> >> Can a single core still gives good results with xenomai ? >> > > Yes. There is nothing in the excerpt above which might suggest the > opposite btw. >
Hi, Do you think it is correct to assume that adding cores will result in a (probably) smaller latency ? Thank you for the time, Ran > -- > Philippe. _______________________________________________ Xenomai mailing list [email protected] https://xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
