On 20/11/17 17:26, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> On 20/11/17 17:25, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
>> On 20/11/17 14:38, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On 11/20/2017 01:14 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> trying to build the new Xenomai version (3.0.6), after have prepared the
>>>> linux
>>>> sources, I got this error:
>>>>
>>>> In file included from arch/x86/xenomai/machine.c:22:0:
>>>> arch/x86/xenomai/include/asm/xenomai/syscall.h: In function
>>>> ‘__xn_get_syscall_nr’:
>>>> arch/x86/xenomai/include/asm/xenomai/syscall.h:46:31: error: implicit
>>>> declaration of function ‘__COBALT_CALL32_SYSNR’
>>>> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>>> #define __xn_syscall(regs) __COBALT_CALL32_SYSNR(__xn_reg_sys(regs) \
>>>> ^
>>>> arch/x86/xenomai/include/asm/xenomai/syscall.h:60:32: note: in expansion of
>>>> macro ‘__xn_syscall’
>>>> return __xn_syscall_p(regs) ? __xn_syscall(regs) :
>>>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>>>>
>>>> I have used the prepare-kernel script and built the Debian packages. The
>>>> platform is a Debian Stretch (amd64) with the default compiler.
>>>>
>>>> linux version linux-4.9.51 and
>>>>
>>>> http://xenomai.org/downloads/ipipe/v4.x/x86/ipipe-core-4.9.51-x86-4.patch
>>>>
>>>> as a patch.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> As a work around, drop CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION if you don't need it.
>>>
Hi,
trying to compile again I found some ugly warnings (gcc-6)
############################################
drivers/xenomai/analogy/buffer.c: In function ‘a4l_ioctl_bufcfg’:
drivers/xenomai/analogy/buffer.c:611:38: warning: ‘*((void *)&buf_cfg+8)’ may be
used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
cxt->dev->transfer.default_bufsize = buf_cfg.buf_size;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
############################################
drivers/xenomai/can/sja1000/rtcan_adv_pci.c: In function
‘rtcan_adv_pci_add_chan’:
drivers/xenomai/can/sja1000/rtcan_adv_pci.c:163:3: warning: this ‘else’ clause
does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
else
^~~~
drivers/xenomai/can/sja1000/rtcan_adv_pci.c:165:4: note: ...this statement, but
the latter is misleadingly indented as if it is guarded by the ‘else’
if (!base_addr) {
^~
############################################
drivers/xenomai/net/stack/rtwlan.c:171:2: warning: this ‘if’ clause does not
guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&rtdev->nrt_lock))
^~
and some erros with 'debug'
./arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h:13:17: error: ‘debug’ redeclared as different
kind of symbol
asmlinkage void debug(void);
^~~~~
drivers/xenomai/net/drivers/eepro100.c:55:12: note: previous definition of
‘debug’ was here
static int debug = -1; /* The debug level */
^~~~~
In file included from ./include/linux/module.h:18:0,
from drivers/xenomai/net/drivers/eepro100.c:85:
drivers/xenomai/net/drivers/eepro100.c: In function ‘__check_debug’:
./include/linux/moduleparam.h:146:27: error: return from incompatible pointer
type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
param_check_##type(name, &(value)); \
^
./include/linux/moduleparam.h:344:68: note: in definition of macro
‘__param_check’
static inline type __always_unused *__check_##name(void) { return(p); }
^
./include/linux/moduleparam.h:146:2: note: in expansion of macro
‘param_check_int’
param_check_##type(name, &(value)); \
^~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/moduleparam.h:126:2: note: in expansion of macro
‘module_param_named’
module_param_named(name, name, type, perm)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/xenomai/net/drivers/eepro100.c:123:1: note: in expansion of macro
‘module_param’
module_param(debug, int, 0444);
^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/xenomai/net/drivers/eepro100.c: In function ‘eepro100_init_module’:
drivers/xenomai/net/drivers/eepro100.c:1832:8: error: lvalue required as left
operand of assignment
debug = speedo_debug; /* touch debug variable */
^
At top level:
drivers/xenomai/net/drivers/eepro100.c:55:12: warning: ‘debug’ defined but not
used [-Wunused-variable]
static int debug = -1; /* The debug level */
^~~~~
######################################################
drivers/xenomai/net/drivers/natsemi.c:199:12: error: ‘debug’ redeclared as
different kind of symbol
static int debug = -1;
^~~~~
In file included from arch/x86/xenomai/include/asm/xenomai/thread.h:25:0,
from include/xenomai/cobalt/kernel/thread.h:35,
from include/xenomai/cobalt/kernel/sched.h:24,
from include/xenomai/rtdm/driver.h:37,
from drivers/xenomai/net/stack/include/rtnet.h:99,
from drivers/xenomai/net/stack/include/rtskb.h:32,
from drivers/xenomai/net/stack/include/rtdev.h:37,
from drivers/xenomai/net/stack/include/rtnet_port.h:32,
from drivers/xenomai/net/drivers/natsemi.c:175:
./arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h:13:17: note: previous declaration of ‘debug’ was
here
asmlinkage void debug(void);
^~~~~
######################################################
drivers/xenomai/net/drivers/pcnet32.c:1458:12: error: ‘debug’ redeclared as
different kind of symbol
static int debug = -1;
^~~~~
In file included from arch/x86/xenomai/include/asm/xenomai/thread.h:25:0,
from include/xenomai/cobalt/kernel/thread.h:35,
from include/xenomai/cobalt/kernel/sched.h:24,
from include/xenomai/rtdm/driver.h:37,
from drivers/xenomai/net/stack/include/rtnet.h:99,
from drivers/xenomai/net/stack/include/rtskb.h:32,
from drivers/xenomai/net/stack/include/rtdev.h:37,
from drivers/xenomai/net/stack/include/rtnet_port.h:32,
from drivers/xenomai/net/drivers/pcnet32.c:60:
./arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h:13:17: note: previous declaration of ‘debug’ was
here
asmlinkage void debug(void);
^~~~~
it's strange to me because 3.0.5 built without any problems. Probably I activate
something in the kernel that provoke the errors. Any idea?.
Best regards,
Leopold
--
--
Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-------------------------------------
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
_______________________________________________
Xenomai mailing list
[email protected]
https://xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
