> FWIW, all of my rtnet fixes that went in since 3.0.6 have been tested on > x86 exclusively.
For us, even the xeno-test/net_udp fails on both x86/arm. I also verified the udp test (loopback) that exists on rtnet repo: https://git.code.sf.net/p/rtnet/code Under: examples/generic/ Then, I also developed a common rtnet udp server/client using posix skin. When I build and verify it on normal kernel it works fine. But when I build it with Xenomai posix skin, I get the kernel oops on both x86/arm. Now it fails with xenomai-3/next (latest) and with Kernel 4.9, on x86. Earlier (1.5 months ago), I remember, rtnet loopback worked on x86_64 with 3.0.6, with "nosmap". If I run the same on Virtual Box Ubuntu 32-bit with same Kernel 4.9, it works. So, I wonder, normally how do you verify rtnet sample application. Please share the test applications and the steps you follow. Thanks, Pintu On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:40 PM Philippe Gerum <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 06/27/2018 07:29 PM, Pintu Kumar wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 10:47 PM Greg Gallagher <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> I don't think Beaglebone is supported currently in RTNet. > >> > > > > But I am just checking loopback interface with 127.0.0.1 > > I hope that should work on all boards and arch, even without > > installing the net driver. > > > > You must be the first and only user giving any feedback about rtnet over > ARM if my memory serves me well. So either all others have been hiding > behind for all these years, or you may be the only specimen of that species. > > FWIW, all of my rtnet fixes that went in since 3.0.6 have been tested on > x86 exclusively. > > -- > Philippe. _______________________________________________ Xenomai mailing list [email protected] https://xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
