Am Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:20:57 +0200
schrieb Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com>:
> On 14.09.18 18:14, Henning Schild wrote:
> > Linux 4.14 dropped support for lazy fpu switching and in the 4.4
> > and 4.9 series similar changes where backported.
> > So fpu is eager for those versions. That simplifies things a lot
> > and we can drop several changes from the IPIPE patch.
> > On the Xenomai side the only thing we still have to care about is
> > the kernel fpu state when we interrupt an in kernel fpu user. But
> > we do that explicit and can drop the indirection active_(fp)state.
> >
> > This patch basically drops most of the fpu specifics from the ipipe
> > patch.
> >
> > This patch applies on ipipe-4.9.y and it has to be followed by a
> > merge with
> >> = 4.9.109. Cobalt will not compile if you are already eager and
> >> still
> > 4.9.108
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Henning Schild <henning.sch...@siemens.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h | 30
> > ++++++++--------------------- arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h |
> > 12 ------------ arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c | 17
> > ++++++---------- arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c | 5 +----
> > 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h
> > b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h index
> > 35ca184e83e1..6bdceba90f17 100644 ---
> > a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h +++
> > b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
> > #include <linux/compat.h>
> > #include <linux/sched.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > -#include <linux/kconfig.h>
> > #include <linux/ipipe.h>
> >
> > #include <asm/user.h>
> > @@ -190,24 +189,12 @@ static inline int copy_user_to_fregs(struct
> > fregs_state __user *fx) return user_insn(frstor %[fx], "=m" (*fx),
> > [fx] "m" (*fx)); }
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_IPIPE
> > -static inline union fpregs_state *active_fpstate(struct fpu *fpu)
> > -{
> > - return fpu->active_state;
> > -}
> > -#else
> > -static inline union fpregs_state *active_fpstate(struct fpu *fpu)
> > -{
> > - return &fpu->state;
> > -}
> > -#endif
> > -
> > static inline void copy_fxregs_to_kernel(struct fpu *fpu)
> > {
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32))
> > - asm volatile( "fxsave %[fx]" : [fx]
> > "=m" (active_fpstate(fpu)->fxsave));
> > + asm volatile( "fxsave %[fx]" : [fx]
> > "=m" (fpu->state.fxsave)); else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AS_FXSAVEQ))
> > - asm volatile("fxsaveq %[fx]" : [fx]
> > "=m" (active_fpstate(fpu)->fxsave));
> > + asm volatile("fxsaveq %[fx]" : [fx]
> > "=m" (fpu->state.fxsave)); else {
> > /* Using "rex64; fxsave %0" is broken because, if
> > the memory
> > * operand uses any extended registers for
> > addressing, a second @@ -231,8 +218,8 @@ static inline void
> > copy_fxregs_to_kernel(struct fpu *fpu)
> > * registers.
> > */
> > asm volatile( "rex64/fxsave (%[fx])"
> > - : "=m" (active_fpstate(fpu)->fxsave)
> > - : [fx]
> > "R" (&active_fpstate(fpu)->fxsave));
> > + : "=m" (fpu->state.fxsave)
> > + : [fx] "R" (&fpu->state.fxsave));
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -441,7 +428,7 @@ static inline int copy_user_to_xregs(struct
> > xregs_state __user *buf, u64 mask) static inline int
> > copy_fpregs_to_fpstate(struct fpu *fpu) {
> > if (likely(use_xsave())) {
> > - copy_xregs_to_kernel(&active_fpstate(fpu)->xsave);
> > + copy_xregs_to_kernel(&fpu->state.xsave);
> > return 1;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -454,7 +441,7 @@ static inline int copy_fpregs_to_fpstate(struct
> > fpu *fpu)
> > * Legacy FPU register saving, FNSAVE always clears FPU
> > registers,
> > * so we have to mark them inactive:
> > */
> > - asm volatile("fnsave %[fp]; fwait" : [fp]
> > "=m" (active_fpstate(fpu)->fsave));
> > + asm volatile("fnsave %[fp]; fwait" : [fp]
> > "=m" (fpu->state.fsave));
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -609,8 +596,7 @@ switch_fpu_prepare(struct fpu *old_fpu, struct
> > fpu *new_fpu, int cpu)
> > * If the task has used the math, pre-load the FPU on
> > xsave processors
> > * or if the past 5 consecutive context-switches used
> > math. */
> > - fpu.preload = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPIPE) &&
> > - static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FPU) &&
> > + fpu.preload = static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FPU) &&
> > new_fpu->fpstate_active &&
> > (use_eager_fpu() || new_fpu->counter > 5);
> >
> > @@ -660,7 +646,7 @@ switch_fpu_prepare(struct fpu *old_fpu, struct
> > fpu *new_fpu, int cpu) */
> > static inline void switch_fpu_finish(struct fpu *new_fpu,
> > fpu_switch_t fpu_switch) {
> > - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPIPE) && fpu_switch.preload)
> > + if (fpu_switch.preload)
> > copy_kernel_to_fpregs(&new_fpu->state);
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h
> > b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h index 497c551469ec..48df486b02f9
> > 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h
> > @@ -332,18 +332,6 @@ struct fpu {
> > * deal with bursty apps that only use the FPU for a
> > short time: */
> > unsigned char counter;
> > -
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_IPIPE
> > - /*
> > - * @active_state
> > - *
> > - * An indirection pointer to reach the active state context
> > - * for the task. This is used by co-kernels for dealing
> > with
> > - * preemption of kernel fpu contexts by their own tasks.
> > - */
> > - union fpregs_state *active_state;
> > -#endif
> > -
> > /*
> > * @state:
> > *
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> > index d31a73b2ab76..7dd8518272ca 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> > @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ void __kernel_fpu_end(void)
> >
> > flags = hard_cond_local_irq_save();
> > if (fpu->fpregs_active)
> > - copy_kernel_to_fpregs(active_fpstate(fpu));
> > + copy_kernel_to_fpregs(&fpu->state);
> > else
> > __fpregs_deactivate_hw();
> >
> > @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ void fpu__save(struct fpu *fpu)
> > if (fpu->fpregs_active) {
> > if (!copy_fpregs_to_fpstate(fpu)) {
> > if (use_eager_fpu())
> > -
> > copy_kernel_to_fpregs(active_fpstate(fpu));
> > + copy_kernel_to_fpregs(&fpu->state);
> > else
> > fpregs_deactivate(fpu);
> > }
> > @@ -244,13 +244,8 @@ int fpu__copy(struct fpu *dst_fpu, struct fpu
> > *src_fpu) dst_fpu->counter = 0;
> > dst_fpu->fpregs_active = 0;
> > dst_fpu->last_cpu = -1;
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_IPIPE
> > - /* Must be set before FPU context is copied. */
> > - dst_fpu->active_state = &dst_fpu->state;
> > -#endif
> >
> > - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPIPE) &&
> > - (!src_fpu->fpstate_active
> > || !static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FPU)))
> > + if (!src_fpu->fpstate_active
> > || !static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FPU)) return 0;
> >
> > WARN_ON_FPU(src_fpu != ¤t->thread.fpu);
> > @@ -283,7 +278,7 @@ int fpu__copy(struct fpu *dst_fpu, struct fpu
> > *src_fpu) fpu_kernel_xstate_size);
> >
> > if (use_eager_fpu())
> > -
> > copy_kernel_to_fpregs(active_fpstate(src_fpu));
> > + copy_kernel_to_fpregs(&src_fpu->state);
> > else
> > fpregs_deactivate(src_fpu);
> > }
> > @@ -430,7 +425,7 @@ void fpu__current_fpstate_write_end(void)
> > * an XRSTOR if they are active.
> > */
> > if (fpregs_active())
> > - copy_kernel_to_fpregs(active_fpstate(fpu));
> > + copy_kernel_to_fpregs(&fpu->state);
> >
> > /*
> > * Our update is done and the fpregs/fpstate are in sync
> > @@ -460,7 +455,7 @@ void fpu__restore(struct fpu *fpu)
> > kernel_fpu_disable();
> > trace_x86_fpu_before_restore(fpu);
> > fpregs_activate(fpu);
> > - copy_kernel_to_fpregs(active_fpstate(fpu));
> > + copy_kernel_to_fpregs(&fpu->state);
> > fpu->counter++;
> > trace_x86_fpu_after_restore(fpu);
> > kernel_fpu_enable();
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c
> > index 3eee35d3d6f8..a1fc061d03e1 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c
> > @@ -42,9 +42,6 @@ static void fpu__init_cpu_generic(void)
> > cr0 |= X86_CR0_EM;
> > write_cr0(cr0);
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_IPIPE
> > - current->thread.fpu.active_state =
> > ¤t->thread.fpu.state; -#endif
> > /* Flush out any pending x87 state: */
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION
> > if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FPU))
> > @@ -329,7 +326,7 @@ static void __init
> > fpu__init_system_ctx_switch(void) eagerfpu = ENABLE;
> >
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPIPE))
> > - eagerfpu = DISABLE;
> > + eagerfpu = ENABLE;
> >
> > if (eagerfpu == ENABLE)
> > setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_EAGER_FPU);
> >
>
> This last hunk will conflict with a merge of 4.9.109+ which
> completely removes the whole section. Shouldn't we just remove that
> I-pipe specific here?
I would suggest to remove it when doing the actual merge. It is in this
patch because it allowed me to test right after that commit, with a
Xenomai that did not match the 108+.
Henning
> Jan
>
_______________________________________________
Xenomai mailing list
Xenomai@xenomai.org
https://xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
