Philippe Gerum <r...@xenomai.org> writes:
> Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> writes: > >> On 07.09.20 15:09, Philippe Gerum wrote: >>> From: Philippe Gerum <r...@xenomai.org> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Gerum <r...@xenomai.org> >>> --- >>> arch/x86/kernel/ipipe.c | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ipipe.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ipipe.c >>> index 3f3afcecc1b9..c5ebfdf2dfb3 100644 >>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ipipe.c >>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ipipe.c >>> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ void smp_irq_move_cleanup_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs); >>> void smp_reboot_interrupt(void); >>> void smp_thermal_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs); >>> void smp_threshold_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs); >>> +void uv_bau_message_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs); >>> >>> void __ipipe_do_IRQ(unsigned int irq, void *cookie); >>> >>> >> >> IIRC, I broke that intentionally. There is more needed, and no one >> should get something building but subtly not working. But we may better do >> >> depends on !IPIPE >> > > Indeed, otherwise plain build tests with e.g. allyesconfig fail miserably. I meant "allnoconfig" of course, but you get the point. -- Philippe.
