On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 10:44 +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote: > [email protected] <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Sat, 2021-02-20 at 16:18 +0100, Philippe Gerum via Xenomai wrote: > > [snip] > > > +#if __BITS_PER_LONG == 64 > > > > That might be a beginner question, but I'm learning from the best ;-) > > > > Do we really care about each single assignment (two per timespec) and > > each object on the stack that it is worth duplicating all this helpers? > > We could use the __BITS_PER_LONG == 32 version for both worlds, > > couldn't we? > > Yes, this would work as well. I agree that the very limited gain is not > worth the code duplication. >
I (or Song) will take care of it. No need to interrupt dovetail stuff...
