On Thu, 2021-03-11 at 17:58 +0800, chensong wrote: > > > > > > I assume we should keep the order of affected syscalls. The next one > > > would be sc_cobalt_clock_gettime64. > > > > yes, i thought about catagorizing them in order, probably adjust > > sc_cobalt_sem_timedwait64 later, next is sc_cobalt_clock_gettime64. > > > > > > > > > > And I'm missing the tests... Please add tests for everything you add / > > > fix. > > > > ongoing. > > > > Song > > by the way, i think it's better test clock_settime64 and clock_gettime64 > together, is it ok for you? > > if i set time at 2038 and set it back at the end of test, will it have > impact to the testing devices?
Sounds reasonable... > > Song > > > > >
