在 2021/4/23 下午8:48, Bezdeka, Florian 写道:
On Wed, 2021-04-21 at 16:38 +0800, Song Chen wrote:
+static int test_sc_cobalt_clock_nanosleep64(void)+{
+       long ret;
+       int code = __xn_syscode(sc_cobalt_clock_nanosleep64);
+       struct xn_timespec64 next, rmt;
+       struct timespec now;
+
+       /* Make sure we don't crash because of NULL pointers */
+       ret = syscall(code, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+       if (ret == -1 && errno == ENOSYS) {
+               smokey_note("clock_nanosleep64: skipped. (no kernel support)");
+               return 0; // Not implemented, nothing to test, success
+       }
+       if (!smokey_assert(ret == -1) || !smokey_assert(errno == EFAULT))
+               return errno;
+
+       /* Provide a valid 64bit timespec*/
+       ret = clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &now);
+       if (ret) {
+               smokey_warning("clock_gettime failed in clock_nanosleep64.");
+               return errno;
+       }
+
+       /* Providing an invalid address has to deliver EFAULT */
+       ret = syscall(code, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, TIMER_ABSTIME,
+                               (void *)0xdeadbeefUL, &rmt);
+       if (!smokey_assert(ret == -1) || !smokey_assert(errno == EFAULT))
+               return errno;
+
+       next.tv_sec  = now.tv_sec + 1;
+       next.tv_nsec = now.tv_nsec;
+
+       ret = syscall(code, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, TIMER_ABSTIME,
+                               &next, (void *)0xdeadbeefUL);
+       if (!smokey_assert(ret == -1) || !smokey_assert(errno == EFAULT))
+               return errno;
+
+       next.tv_sec  = next.tv_sec + 1;

That looks like duplicate code. The last call to nanosleep was an error
handling check, so we would end up here adding 2 secs to "now".

point taken

+
+       ret = syscall(code, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, TIMER_ABSTIME, &next, &rmt);
+       if (!smokey_assert(!ret))
+               return errno;
+

As long as nobody has a better idea we should make sure that we don't
come back to early. Checking for the upper boundary requires some magic
numbers as already discussed, so let's check at least the lower
boundary.

point is not taken, could you please explain upper/lower boundary more specifically, thanks.

Song


+       return 0;
+}
+
  static int run_y2038(struct smokey_test *t, int argc, char *const argv[])
  {
        int ret;
@@ -244,5 +290,9 @@ static int run_y2038(struct smokey_test *t, int argc, char 
*const argv[])
        if (ret)
                return ret;
+ ret = test_sc_cobalt_clock_nanosleep64();
+       if (ret)
+               return ret;
+
        return 0;
  }


Reply via email to