The CI pipeline discovered an invalid instruction on some ARM boards, especially the BBB (beaglebone black). Applying this patch series sould fix the current test failure on "next" branch.
As already discussed: There might be another problem in the ARM syscall prologue/epilogue but it still makes sense to use the same macro for calling the syscalls as libcobalt does. I'm still asking myself why libcobalt has special macros for calling the syscalls instead of using plain syscall() from *libc. Any input? The main difference to v3: - Migration from syscall() (libc) to XENOAMAI_SYSCALLx() Florian Bezdeka (4): cobalt/sem: y2038: Fixing the sem_timedwait syscall for 32 bit systems y2038: Adding sem_timedwait64 y2038: Add tests for the sc_cobalt_sem_timedwait64 syscall y2038: lib/cobalt: Add support of sc_cobalt_sem_timedwait64 configure.ac | 1 + include/cobalt/kernel/time.h | 22 +++ include/cobalt/uapi/syscall.h | 1 + kernel/cobalt/Makefile | 1 + kernel/cobalt/posix/sem.c | 60 ++++++--- kernel/cobalt/posix/sem.h | 13 +- kernel/cobalt/posix/syscall32.c | 17 ++- kernel/cobalt/posix/syscall32.h | 6 +- kernel/cobalt/time.c | 29 ++++ lib/cobalt/semaphore.c | 5 + testsuite/smokey/Makefile.am | 6 +- testsuite/smokey/y2038/Makefile.am | 10 ++ testsuite/smokey/y2038/syscall-tests.c | 177 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 13 files changed, 317 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/cobalt/kernel/time.h create mode 100644 kernel/cobalt/time.c create mode 100644 testsuite/smokey/y2038/Makefile.am create mode 100644 testsuite/smokey/y2038/syscall-tests.c -- 2.31.1
