i initiated mutex in the main thread and acquire at the same context, is it wrong?

Should i lock it in the main thread and acquire it in another thread with a timeout?

i will try.

/Song

在 2021/5/24 下午5:20, chensong_2000--- via Xenomai 写道:
hi,

i'm working on mutex_timedlock64, the call stack roughly is supposed to be:

CoBaLt_mutex_timedlock64 -- __cobalt_mutex_timedlock_break -- xnsynch_acquire -- xnthread_suspend

however, it doesn't go to xnthread_suspend as expected, turns out it returns from here:

h = atomic_cmpxchg(lockp, XN_NO_HANDLE,
                get_owner_handle(currh, synch));

     if (likely(h == XN_NO_HANDLE)) {
         set_current_owner(synch, curr);
         xnthread_get_resource(curr);
         return 0;
     }

atomic_cmpxchg returns 0.

i printed some information by
printk("%s, 1, curr handle: 0x%x, status: 0x%x, lockp: 0x%x\n", __FUNCTION__, currh, synch->status, lockp); printk("curr: 0x%x, name:%s, owner: 0x%x\n ", curr, curr->name, synch->owner);

got these:
xnsynch_acquire, 1, curr handle: 0x20, status: 0xb, lockp: 0xb810e40
curr: 0x6c4408, name:lt-smokey, owner: 0x0


As far as my understanding, atomic_cmpxchg is supposed to assign curr handle (0x20) to lockp->v, is my unserstanding correct and is there anything i can do to dig into atomic_cmpxchg?

Any tips would be appreciated, many thanks.

BR

Song




Reply via email to