On 29.07.21 13:29, Florian Bezdeka wrote: > The mutex of the smokey_barrier used inside protect_handover() was > never destroyed. This had side effects when trying to extend the test > suite with an additional function that had a mutex located on the same > address than the never cleaned up smokey_barrier lock. > > Signed-off-by: Florian Bezdeka <florian.bezd...@siemens.com> > --- > testsuite/smokey/posix-mutex/posix-mutex.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/testsuite/smokey/posix-mutex/posix-mutex.c > b/testsuite/smokey/posix-mutex/posix-mutex.c > index 9a55d0973..e5793c42c 100644 > --- a/testsuite/smokey/posix-mutex/posix-mutex.c > +++ b/testsuite/smokey/posix-mutex/posix-mutex.c > @@ -997,6 +997,8 @@ static int protect_handover(void) > if (!__T(ret, pthread_mutex_destroy(&mutex))) > return ret; > > + smokey_barrier_destroy(&barrier); > + > return 0; > } > >
Thanks, applied. Jan -- Siemens AG, T RDA IOT Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
