On 10.08.21 12:23, Florian Bezdeka wrote: > Hi! > > This series is based on the series posted by Song some time ago. The > testing part has been heavily reworked. Details are mentioned in the > description of the last patch. > > @Jan: Patch 1 and 2 are re-sends. They are not directly related to the > y2038 stuff but the testsuite might fail if they are not applied. > > Testing was done on x86 only so far, internal CI is still running but no > problems expected. > > Best regards, > Florian > > Changes in v5: > - Patch 5: Integrated fixes already made by Jan on next > - Patch 5: Fix typo >
Is this series equivalent with bb64c8c66aeec3b5ead55fcfa9c79efda8064f7f in next? Or do I have to replace next with it? Or do I only have to replace bb64c8c66a (patch 5)? Jan -- Siemens AG, T RDA IOT Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
