On 3/17/22 4:44 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 17.03.22 16:24, Scott Reed wrote:


On 3/16/22 11:35 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 16.03.22 10:58, Scott Reed wrote:


On 3/15/22 9:42 AM, Scott Reed via Xenomai wrote:


On 3/15/22 7:32 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 14.03.22 18:45, Scott Reed wrote:


On 3/11/22 2:13 PM, Scott Reed via Xenomai wrote:

On 3/11/22 12:38 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 11.03.22 11:12, Scott Reed via Xenomai wrote:
Hello,

I am seeing an apparent issue with PCIe MSI interrupts and I-pipe
when trying to move to a newer kernel and I-pipe patch.

The issue is as soon as a PCIe MSI interrupt occurs, the system
hangs with no message output on the serial console or in
/var/log/messages.

The platform I am working on is a "i.MX 6 Quad" and I am upgrading
from a 4.14.62 kernel and I-pipe patch with Xenomai 3.07 to
5.4.151
kernel and I-pipe patch with Xenomai 3.2.1.

Our FPGA is connected to the i.MX 6 via PCIe and generates PCIe
MSI
interrupts to the CPU from, for example, an Altera Triple-Speed
MAC.

I have stable system running for some time with Linux 4.14.62 with
Xenomai 3.07 although I did need to patch the PCIe driver [1].
Also
some time back, I tried to move to 4.14.110 with I-pipe and also
saw same scenario of my system hanging on the first PCIe MSI
interrupt
so I backed out back to 4.14.62. Now I am trying to move to
5.4.151,
but
see the same hang.

What about 4.19.y-cip? Specifically because of
https://source.denx.de/Xenomai/ipipe-arm/-/commit/a1aab8ba3098e595f9fa8b23a011ce6d72f8699c.




Actually, that commit is also missing from the last tagged 5.4
ipipe
version (ipipe-core-5.4.151-arm-4). So try ipipe/5.4.y head
instead.

To do a quick test, I just applied the change from the commit you
referenced above to my 5.4.151 ipipe kernel and it unfortunately
did not
help (hang still occurs with first interrupt).



Before I dive into analyzing the hang, I wanted to ask:

What are other people's experiences with using PCIe MSI interrupts
and I-pipe?

I am thinking of trying 5.10.103 Dovetail to see if I still see
the problem. Would this be recommended?

If you can migrate your test with reasonable effort, yes,
definitely.

I will try to migrate my test to 5.10.103 Dovetail with the hopes
that
it will not be too much effort and report back.

I tried to migrate my test to 5.10.103 Dovetail and failed on the
first
step, namely bringing up a standard (i.e. no Dovetail) 5.10.103
kernel
on my platform.

The kernel boots without a problem, but the FEC Ethernet port on the
i.MX 6 is not working (cannot ping in or out).

Do you have or did you have any custom patches on top?

Only a patch to add the device tree include (dtsi) for our imx6 SOC:
      μQ7-962 - μQseven standard module with NXP i.MX 6 Processor



I looked at the trace with Wireshark and it looks like when pinging
out that the ARP packet is corrupt and therefore failing. The ARP
packet is corrupt in that it looks like various bits are flipped. For
example, the source MAC address should be
     00:09:cc:02:c1:b6
but is
     00:01:cc:02:01:36 or
     00:09:cc:02:c1:36
Wireshark also complains about the Frame check sequence
([FCS Status: Unverified]

I can provide Wireshark dumps if someone is interested, but for me
at this point I do not want to fight with getting a 5.10.x kernel
to work as I was pretty far along moving to a 5.4.x kernel with
ipipe before running into the original problem posted (with ipipe
my system freezes on the first PCIe MSI interrupt. Note: without
ipipe, I do not see any issues).

As mentioned, I first saw this problem a while ago when trying
to move from 4.14.62+ipipe to 4.14.110+ipipe and at that time
then backed back down to 4.14.62+ipipe which works.

I guess my next strategy is to try to figure out what changed
between 4.14.62+ipipe and 4.14.110+ipipe which triggers/causes
the hang as I hope the delta between them is not too large.

If anyone has other suggestions or tips, they are more than welcome.

As I wrote before: try the latest 4.19-cip-ipipe first.

OK. Will do.

I was able to run my test where the system hangs on the first
PCIe MSI interrupt on the latest 4.19-cip-ipipe (4.19.229) and
unfortunately see the same behavior (system hangs).

PCIe MSI interrupts work as expected on a "vanilla" 4.19.229 kernel,
but when I add  ipipe and Xenomai 3.2.1 to the kernel, then
the system hangs on the first PCIe MSI interrupt.

As mentioned before, I first observed this behavior when moving from
4.14.62+ipipe and 4.14.110+ipipe so I think my best bet is to dive
into what changed in this time frame. My goal is still to move to

Yes, that might be a way now to try to find the root cause. Problem: you
can't do bisection easily because of the merges with the I-pipe patch.
Therefore, it can be easier to actually debug where the system hangs, on
what. With some traces from there, it can then be simpler again to
analyse the differences between to working and non-working 4.14 kernels.


I have been able to get my test running on 4.14.110+ipipe without the
system hanging on the first PCIe MSI interrupt. I have attached my
patch (hopefully the attachment shows up correctly, but if not
please let me know).

The fix is to replace in the PCIe MSI interrupt handler the call
to generic_handle_irq() with ipipe_handle_demuxed_irq.

Great to hear! Looks a lot like
https://source.denx.de/Xenomai/ipipe-noarch/-/commit/578e2cbf69ce8e22546423d403cda4a438d0751f


Actually, I had already made this patch on my 4.14.62 system
in combination with a patch to make the PCIe driver an RTDM
driver (see [1]) to address latency issues. As this patch was for
a latency issue on 4.14.62 and not a hang, I did not immediately
think about the ipipe part of the patch being the fix for the
hang I was seeing when moving to 4.14.110+ipipe.

I will now check if the same/similar patch fixes my original
hang on 5.4.151+ipipe.

Would it make sense to integrate this patch into next ipipe release?


Yep. Please prepare an official patch once done with testing. I will add
it to ipipe-noarch, and then the architecture trees (relevant for arm &
arm64) can pick it up.

Will do. May take me a day or two to be able to submit an official patch
as it will be my first official patch.

I will submit (i.e. send to mailing list) the patch on ipipe-noarch:
ipipe/master which looks like it is currently based on 5.4.179 once
my testing is complete.

If my understanding is not correct, please let me know.

Scott

Jan


Reply via email to