It used to be easy, but I'm not sure how easy it is now. Probably pulling
the DOM out is fine. The thing that gotten broken recently is that you can't
pull the sax stuff out, because there is now a circular dependency
introduced by the SAX2 stuff. But basically, if you just want to do SAX
parsing, just throw out the DOM directory, and keep the rest. Anything else
that you get rid of isn't doing to buy you much. If you don't need lots of
encodings, use the platform based transcoding services and leave out ICU.
--------------------------
Dean Roddey
The CIDLib C++ Frameworks
Charmed Quark Software
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.charmedquark.com
"Why put off until tomorrow what you can
put off until the day after tomorrow?"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Julian Klappenbach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 3:12 PM
Subject: SAX Parser only?
> Is it possible to produce a library containing only code necessary for SAX
> parsing without much effort. I've begun to look into it, but figured I'd
> ask if it's been done before devoting much time to it. We need a sax
parser
> supporting namespaces, and DTD validation.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Julian
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
