|
It is guaranteed by C++ standard, not by platfom compiler
itself :(, especially for Solaris.
So, if (fCurReader) { ... } will not do much
harm.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 4:07
AM
Subject: Re: Bug in ReaderMgr::reset ()
?
No, it is guaranteed by the
language that the deletion of a zeroed pointer
will be
legal.
--------------------------
Dean Roddey
The CIDLib C++
Frameworks
Charmed Quark Software
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.charmedquark.com
"Why
put off until tomorrow what you can
put off until the day after
tomorrow?"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alexander Zeyliger"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
Friday, April 20, 2001 5:59 PM
Subject: Bug in ReaderMgr::reset ()
?
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I've been getting
some crashes in the library (1.4.0, Solaris 8)
> in the ReadeMgr::reset
call. By looking at the code (addmittedly
> not very thouroughly),
I think there is a chance that this
> method is called twice in a row
(from XMLScan, when certain exceptions
> happen). However, there
is a couple of lines there:
>
> delete fCurReader;
>
fCurReader = 0;
>
> which may definitely cause problems if called
twice.
> Shouldn't it be if (fCurReader) { ... } ?
>
>
Thanks,
> AZ
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To
unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
