Re: PLEASE HELP: SAX parser errors on validation when ValScheme=V al_Never?????

[Jason E. Stewart]

"Peter A. Volchek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> But, why not provide the (let name it advanced api ) additional feature,
> which allows to suppress it? (especially, when so many people require it).
> At least, it may be put in the protected area of a parser, so that it might
> be used, only by those people who really knows what they are required.

Ok, so there already seems to be a solution, create an entity resolver
and handle it, right?

The question then becomes, is this really such a common case, should a
flag be added to the parser to ignore the lack of a DTD. 

Seems to me if you know ahead of time, you won't have the DTD, why not
create the entity resolver? Is it that much overhead?

jas.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]