These three files are still under construction (actually not ready yet), and
thus should not be built together.  I did explicitly exclude them from the VCPP
project files, and UNIX Makefiles.  So you may want to do the same thing in your
MacOS project file.  I plan to complete them within the next couple weeks, which
by that time, you can include them again....

Thanks!

Tinny.

James Berry wrote:

> Okay, so I'm closer to an answer.
>
> My problem was that there are three (well, six with headers) files in the
> IDOM directory that are apparently artifacts. These are:
>
>     IDTreeWalkerImpl.*
>     IDNodeIteratorImpl.*
>     IDRangeImpl.*
>
> Building in these files causes the symbol conflicts with similarly named
> files in the DOM implementation.
>
> Can Andy or Tinny confirm that these are in fact unwanted, and that the like
> files in the DOM directory suffice? And remove these files eventually if
> they're artifacts of the bring-up?
>
> Thanks!
>
> -jdb
>
> On 5/23/01 1:30 PM, "Andy Heninger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I would have guessed that putting both DOMs into the same static library
> > would work.  The classic DOM and IDOM are built into the same DLL on
> > Windows, so I would have expected that any symbol conflicts would have
> > showed up there too.
> >
> > Tinny is working on finishing up the missing parts of the IDOM
> > implementation, so you might want to ask about getting her latest files.
> >
> > Andy Heninger
> > IBM, Cupertino, CA
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "James Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Xerces C Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: "Andy Heninger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 11:15 AM
> > Subject: Re: Static library
> >
> >
> >> Hi Andy,
> >>
> >> I ran into a problem the other day in trying to integrate the IDOM
> > sources
> >> into the MacOS build, which builds currently as a static library. I was
> >> hoping to just include the IDOM, as well as the classic DOM, in the
> > library.
> >> But they seem to have some symbol conflicts between them.
> >>
> >> Any comment on what the intent is here?
> >>
> >> -jdb
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to