Most people are moving towards WSDL rather than Schema's (although
WSDL contains Schema information).  A number of existing
implementations will check that the request / response conforms to the
schema defined in the WSDL, although the current crop of tools only
support a fairly small subset of the schema language.

Given that section 5 encoding can generate largely random variations
on output (element names, structural differences via id/hrefs etc),
i'm don't know how a pure schema validation approach is going to work.

Cheers
Simon


On Fri, 08 Jun 2001 13:14:20 -0400, in xml you wrote:

>At 08:41 AM 6/8/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>>AFAIK, no one is building SOAP engines with validation, in which case
>>Xerces works fine.
>
>This should help in the short term.
>
>Longer term...inter-enterprise SOAP based communication without 
>validation...pretty scary stuff...
>
>>[1] has a list of SOAP implementations, you might
>>want to take one of these as a starting point.
>>
>>Cheers
>>Simon
>>www.pocketsoap.com
>>[1] http://www.soapware.org/directory/4/implementations
>>
>>
>>On Fri, 08 Jun 2001 10:35:13 -0400, in xml you wrote:
>>
>> >I need to develop a C++ XMLP/SOAP 1.1 client ASAP.  The SOAP schemas have
>> >been updated for http://www.33.org/2001/XMLSchema.  Is anyone successfully
>> >parsing SOAP or know if the parser is capable yet ?  From the FAQ, it
>> >appears it is not ready.
>> >
>> >Best guess re: when it will be ready ?
>> >
>> >Cheers,
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to