You're absolutely right, the '{"#x05BC", "[#x064C-#x0651]", "#x06DE"}' are valid NameChar characters, and they are missing from the fgCharCharsTable. Would you please open a bugzilla bug for it?
Thanks,
Khlaed
Chris Hill wrote:
At 05:27 PM 7/20/2001, Chris Hill wrote:
>I was running my modified version of Xerces 1.4 against a test suite and I
>noticed that the character 0x05bc isn't marked in the fgCharCharsTable as
>a NameChar. Am I correct that the table is in error for this
>character? I would have thought this table would have been checked
>against the spec. Perhaps there are more characters which are not
>correctly flagged? I'm not exactly sure what all the flags in
>XMLReader.hpp mean.I wrote a program to compare the fgCharCharsTable to NameChar [4] in the
XML specification. I came up with the following differences:{"#x05BC", "[#x064C-#x0651]", "#x06DE"}
These characters should are valid name characters according to the spec but
not according to Xerces' table.As I mentioned before, I don't know what all Xerces' masks are for. Should
I open a bug about this?>One question I had is about the parser's support for surrogate pairs. It
>appears that is some places in the code there is support for surrogate
>pairs mixed with calls to isXMLChar (which surrogate characters aren't)
>such as XMLScanner::basicAttrValueScan. I noticed that comments and PI's
>can't contain characters > 0xFFFF. As far as I can tell surrogates are
>fine between start and end tags. Is this a work in progress?Comments?
Chris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
