It's a good idea. But of course, you knew I'd say that..
jas.
"Fred Eisele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Many times the question of a DOM Serialize method has been mentioned.
> Could someone explain to me exactly what the problem is?
> As I understand it the problem is that the DOM standard does not
> specify the API for such a method and until that is done,
> no undefined methods will appear in Xerces.
>
> Presuming that my impression is correct, would it be a bad
> thing to have an extension library?
> The library would have such things as serialization, xpath, etc.
> That is, things which are not and may never be in the spec
> but make development less painful.
>
> What do you think?
>
> P.S. These things have been/are being added in Xerces-Perl
> which is built upon Xerces-C
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
