Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vote

[Murray Cumming]

"Jason E. Stewart" wrote:
> 
> Subject: Re: ["Tinny Ng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Changing include to include/xercesc - 
>Summary and Vote
> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 01:55:34 -0700
> From: "Randolph Chung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jason E. Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> No, I don't follow the xerces list. Thanks for the heads up.
> 
> The header include directory certainly has been an issue. I've even had
> some bugs filed against it....
> 
> FWIW I think the proposed solution is definitely better than what we have
> now.
> 
> It'd be also great if upstream would make their Makefiles a bit more...
> um.... Unix-friendly. If you look at the Debian package you will see
> some hacks I had to put in to get proper sonames and such.

Can you point us to a patch?

-- 
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]