David,

I had a similar experience with MSXML3/4.  I originally used MSXML because 
it was the native XML parser for windows and in many respects, provides 
richer (more functional) APIs.  However the memory leakage and deployment 
problems caused me to seek other alternatives.  With Xerces, the most 
common complaint has been in the area of memory leaks, but the problems are 
being addressed in a timely fashion.

Don

At 05:25 PM 10/18/2001 +0200, you wrote:
>                         Hi all,
>
>         I'm using MSXML4 on a NT platform to parse and modify XML documents.
>I'm testing my application and have memory problems. It seems that the
>application doesn't release my object. If I execute my application many
>successive times, I have no more memory available!!
>         I have check all my memory allocations and I release everything!
>Does someone know if MSXML has known problems with memory use? Does Xerces
>make a better use of memory?
>
>         Thanks for help
>
>         David.
>
>DELGRANCHE David
>SOGITEC Industries
>Division Documentation et Syst�mes
>24 avenue Lavoisier
>BP 7408
>35174 BRUZ cedex
>T�l: 02.99.05.34.25
>Fax: 02.99.05.34.05
>email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>--------------Interscan------------- (on the network)
>
>email-body was scanned and no virus found
>------------------------------Traite par ISVW---------------
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to