Thanks, Dennis.

I am looking for a more stable ( either DOM or IDOM) parser with most of the
bug fixed.
Which version should I download?
I probably will go for the DOM since the work experimental IDOM scared me.

Any suggestion is welcomed. Thanks

Eva

"Houle, Dennis W" wrote:

> Eva,
> I'm developing a real-time embedded XML application so IDOM was the clear
> choice for me to reduce memory use and improve timing.
>
> I'm still in the development stage so I haven't been using IDOM for a long
> time, nor on large files.  I'm sure there are long time users out there who
> could share there IDOM experiences.
>
> Based on my experience so far, I would only remind you to not delete any
> pointers returned from IDOM operations - just delete the IDOM_Document* when
> finished with the XML document.
>
> The IDOM samples were helpful to me to get started.
> - Dennis
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eva Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 3:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: getElementsByTagName in IDOM
>
> Hi Dennis,
>
> So you have been working with IDOM for a long time?
> You think is safe and fast  in parsing very large xml data using buffer too
> ?
>
> Any suggestion is welcomed.. thanks
>
> eva
>
> "Houle, Dennis W" wrote:
>
> > Eva,
> > It sounds like the problem you are describing was the following bug:
> >
> >  * Revision 1.5  2001/08/07 17:01:09  tng
> >  * [Bug 2676] IDOM: pure virtual called in IDDeepNodeListImpl::item() .
> >
> > So you'll need to update to a build that's at least newer than 2001/08/07
> > (http://xml.apache.org/dist/xerces-c/nightly/).
> >
> > I've also pasted below a posting that compares DOM and IDOM performance.
> > The IDOM seems stable and well supported.
> >
> > - Dennis
> >
> > Hey All,
> >
> > I just did some memory checks and timing of DOM vs IDOM. I thought I'd
> > post them in case people were interested:
> >
> > Test File
> > =========
> > $ ll DrosGenome1_BioSequence.xml
> > -rw-r--r--    1 jasons   jasons   10022430 Sep  7 10:52
> > DrosGenome1_BioSequence.xml
> >
> > 10Mb file, ~170k elements.
> >
> > IDOM
> > ====
> > $ memwatch.pl IDOMCount -v=never DrosGenome1_BioSequence.xml
> > Memory Usage for process 14375 = 3712 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14375 = 15404 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14375 = 23016 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14375 = 30064 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14375 = 36652 kB
> > DrosGenome1_BioSequence.xml: 24482 ms (172011 elems).
> >
> > DOM
> > ====
> > $ memwatch.pl DOMCount -v=never DrosGenome1_BioSequence.xml
> > Memory Usage for process 14377 = 3712 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14377 = 16484 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14377 = 25848 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14377 = 35228 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14377 = 44620 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14377 = 54000 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14377 = 63368 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14377 = 72732 kB
> > DrosGenome1_BioSequence.xml: 36587 ms (172011 elems).
> > Memory Usage for process 14377 = 75772 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14377 = 75772 kB
> >
> > So IDOM has about half the memory usage for a 100Mb file and parses it
> > in 2/3 the time
> >
> > Perl API
> > ========
> >
> > Just for the curious here are the corresponding results for the Perl API
> >
> > IDOM
> > ====
> > $ memwatch.pl perl samples/IDOMCount.pl -v=never
> DrosGenome1_BioSequence.xml
> > Memory Usage for process 14364 = 3712 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14364 = 19748 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14364 = 27376 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14364 = 34424 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14364 = 41008 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14364 = 47264 kB
> > DrosGenome1_BioSequence.xml: duration: 26 wallclock secs (23.68 usr +
> 0.35
> > sys = 24.03 CPU)
> >         (172011 elems)
> >
> > Only slightly slower, with about 25% more memory usage
> >
> > DOM
> > ====
> > $ memwatch.pl perl samples/DOMCount.pl -v=never
> DrosGenome1_BioSequence.xml
> > Memory Usage for process 14366 = 3712 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14366 = 22248 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14366 = 32004 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14366 = 41792 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14366 = 51552 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14366 = 61264 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14366 = 70920 kB
> > Memory Usage for process 14366 = 80600 kB
> > DrosGenome1_BioSequence.xml: duration: 36 wallclock secs (34.75 usr +
> 0.47
> > sys = 35.22 CPU)
> >         (172011 elems)
> >
> > Seems to be about the same speed with < 10% more memory usage.
> >
> > jas.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Eva Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:18 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: getElementsByTagName in IDOM
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to us IDOM_Document::getElementsByTagName im the following
> > code, and I got a code dump.
> > I am using the stable built from xerces-c-src_2001-07-17, my plateform
> > is solaris
> > Any idea why?
> >
> > Also, Have any one use IDOM, is it pretty save in general??  I am
> > writing new application that will use  DOM parser,
> > not sure if I should stick with DOM or IDOM.
> >
> > Thanks for your reply in advance.
> >
> > Here is the code:
> >
> >  IDOM_Node *doc = parser->getDocument();
> >
> >         IDOM_Document *document = parser->getDocument();
> >
> >         std::cout << " got the document" << std::endl;
> >
> >         IDOM_NodeList *list;
> >
> >         char * str = "CommandIndex";
> >         cout << " CommandIndex: " << str << endl;
> >
> >         list = document->getElementsByTagName(XMLString::transcode(str)
> > );
> >         std::cout << " got the list " << std::endl;
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to