As a general proposal, how about we exclude any out-dated project files like BCB4, Vacpp in the source package distribution but still leave them in CVS in case some users need them? It is confusing to ship some project files that are out-of sync with the source.
Any comment? If I don't hear otherwise, then that's the way Xerces-C++ 1.7 will be packaged. Tinny Don Mastrovito wrote: > I've sent updates to Tinny for the lastest changes to the BCB project. The > project file now supports the sane-includes changes. Unlike my previous > updates, this one has added a BCB6 project. I will no longer be > maintaining the BCB5 stuff. In case you are not aware, Borland has started > shipping version 6 on 2/11. > > In an effort to clean up some clutter, how do people feel about deleting > the BCB4 directory now? What about deleting the BCB5 directory in the near > future? > > Don > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
