As far as I know, that's just the way bugzilla works. In part, it helps control what goes into the bug record: you have to log in to be able to file and/or comment on bugs. If you'd like to see bugzilla's behavior change, talk to the folks at bugzilla (http://www.bugzilla.org/). Be prepared to offer to help.
-----Original Message----- From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 10:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Why are bug related comments made via SMTP discarded? I've been glancing at these now since I joined the xerces-c developer's list, its like watching cvs traffic for a system I'm only interested in parts of. For some reason this morning I read the SHOUTING boiler-phrase: > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT > <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12455>. > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. Now my lab has an ADSL upstream, but I could be poorer-provisioned in the forseeable future, or even choose to return to store-and-forward transport (uucp), for better delay-insensitive bulk data transport. So, I'm curious, why the http-dependency in this developer activity? It isn't as if the use cases for xerces-c is limited to XML-over-http. I suppose I dislike browsers more than MUAs. Even mozilla. Cheers, Eric --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
