It wouldn't be any good for PocketPC, right? It would only be for STBes
and such, which are running 4.0. But, I guess that's still a pretty big
set of possible applications.

-------------------------------------
Dean Roddey
The Charmed Quark Controller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.charmedquark.com
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Zdenek Nemec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 1:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: windows CE .NET


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dean Roddey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 8:59 PM
Subject: RE: windows CE .NET


> On major problem with Windows CE 3 is that it does not support C++
> exceptions, which makes it pretty useless for any serious C++ code.

agree

> Xerces is pretty exception based internally, so it would be fairly
> painful to make it work on Win CE. Really porting it to .Net would
mean
> writing it in C#, which would be almost a rewrite and a completely
> different code base.

no that's not true, i've ment to use embedded visual c++ 4.0 (c/c++
unmanaged code - not depending on the compact framework )since windows
CE
.NET are almost mature os and they are exception aware.
i'd like to try it.
i ve been just curious if someone tryied it already.

regards
Zdenek Nemec


> -------------------------------------
> Dean Roddey
> The Charmed Quark Controller
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.charmedquark.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to