My reading of it was that you need an overload for setEntityResolver that takes an EntityResolver2 and does the right thing dependent on if you have ER2, ER, or nothing and if the appropriate features flag is set. I was planning on implementing it in this fashion. Does this seem OK?
Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Gareth Reakes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 03 April 2003 16:01 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: EntityResolver doesn't receive the baseURI (repost) > > > Hi, > sorry about the lack of response the first time. Is there a reason > why you can't go over to use the official DOM stuff? If so perhaps we > should have 2 constructors so we don't break backwards compatibility. How > does this sound to you? > > Gareth > > -- > Gareth Reakes, Head of Product Development +44-1865-203192 > DecisionSoft Limited http://www.decisionsoft.com > XML Development and Services > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
