We used the XMLSpy Code Generator in order to fast-prototype and develop some XML software in C++. Xerces was selected as the underlying DOM under the higher level XMLSpy-generated object model. All worked great but we do have some memory leak issues (we have to process hundreds of XML files at a time and they bogged down the system because of the memory leak -- XMLSpy issued a bug report related to it). Anyway ... that was just background ...
Typically in our calling sequence we are "constructing and populating" XML node subtrees and then attaching them to parent node(s) afterwards i.e. making use of document fragments and then appending those to parent nodes. Is this less efficient than doing the parent/child attachment before further populating the children with more nodes? Is there a preferred way? thanks, durwood --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
