I'm not as concerned with the class prototype as I am with as to why MyFunction does not link correctly when I am using the xerces namespace. I get a LNK2001 error.
Also, going through other developer's code and including needed headers instead of using class prototypes might make some people angry... as will making them use the xerces namespace.
I'm really just looking for the simplest way to upgrade so as not to cause problems. If I actually have to go through and add the using namespace declaration, that would be tolerable, but at the moment there are still linking and qualifying issues as I have explained.
Thanks for your time, I really do appreciate it.
Stephanie Milchak
Software Engineer
WebSphere Business Integration
Research Triangle Park, NC
"Adam Heinz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
12/22/2003 12:01 PM
|
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: RE: Disabling C++ Namespace |
If you're already including Xerces headers in your header, why not just include the needed headers rather than use a class prototype?
Adam Heinz
Development Consultant
Exstream Software