DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26980>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26980 XMLStringPool is not useful as a base class [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-17 23:41 ------- Hi Dave. No disputing that it would have been better to use an abstract class than a concrete class in the XMLGrammarPool design; I guess this somehow just slipped by all the people who had a look at the original draft. So it looks like the best compromise we have is for me to make the data members protected, which is what I'll do. We've taken sufficient flak for breaking source-code compatibility between minor releases that changing the interface at this point just isn't an option; and I don't think anybody's contemplating a Xerces 3 yet... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
