Re: Still no luck with blank lines around CDATA sections (easily repeatable!)

[Gareth Reakes]

Hey,
	then this is not strictly a bug. The spec says you can do pretty much 
what you want. If you want to change the behavior, then take a look at 
dom/impl/DOMWriterImpl.cpp around the 1350 line mark. If you feel you 
can come up with the change you suggest without breaking anything else 
I will happily take a look and commit.

Cheers,
Gareth
On 5 Aug 2004, at 11:57, T MacAdam wrote:
Yes, I do have the pretty printing feature on...
Tom.
--- Gareth Reakes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
        IIRC, we put some code in before last release that
fixed a few other
problems in DOMWriter. This seems to have had the
effect of introducing
the problem you are seeing. Do you have the pretty
print feature on?
Gareth
On 5 Aug 2004, at 3:14, T MacAdam wrote:
I posted a question recently regarding blank lines
being introduced around CDATA sections by
DOMWriter.
I didn't get any responses, and I've spent more
time
testing things and still have no solution.  The
problem can easily be reproduced by simply running
a
simple XML file containing a CDATA section through
the
DOMPrint sample that comes with Xerces (making
sure
pretty printing is turned on).  For example, my
simple
XML file contains:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"
standalone="no"
?>
<script>
  <![CDATA[Some Text]]>
</script>
When I run it through DOMPrint using:
C:\>DOMPrint -wfpp=on TestSimple.xml
I get the following output:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"
standalone="no"
?>
<script>
  <![CDATA[Some Text]]>
</script>
If I save that output to a file and run it
through, I
get even more blank lines!
I'm beginning to think it's a bug; a file should
not
grow like this when saved repeatedly should it?  I
did
get the latest from CVS and I began to dig into
the
code differences between the two versions, but
Xerces
is so big I didn't get very far.  Could anyone
point
me in the right direction as to where to start
looking?  Also, could someone confirm whether or
not a
Unix or Linux version does the same.  If not,
could it
be something about end-of-line character
conversion on
Windows?
Thanks in advance...
Tom.
P.S. my last message is in the archives at:


http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xerces-c-dev&m=109098018927374&w=2

                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
Gareth Reakes, Managing Director      Parthenon
Computing
+44-1865-811184
http://www.parthcomp.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Gareth Reakes, Managing Director      Parthenon Computing
+44-1865-811184                  http://www.parthcomp.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]