http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2530

*** shadow/2530 Tue Jul 10 10:37:06 2001
--- shadow/2530.tmp.9791        Wed Jul 11 08:40:20 2001
***************
*** 2,9 ****
  | New method BaseMarkupSerializer.processingInstructionIO breaks existing de |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |        Bug #: 2530                        Product: Xerces-J                |
! |       Status: NEW                         Version: 1.4.1                   |
! |   Resolution:                            Platform: All                     |
  |     Severity: Normal                   OS/Version: All                     |
  |     Priority: Other                     Component: Serialization           |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
--- 2,9 ----
  | New method BaseMarkupSerializer.processingInstructionIO breaks existing de |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |        Bug #: 2530                        Product: Xerces-J                |
! |       Status: RESOLVED                    Version: 1.4.1                   |
! |   Resolution: FIXED                      Platform: All                     |
  |     Severity: Normal                   OS/Version: All                     |
  |     Priority: Other                     Component: Serialization           |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
***************
*** 55,57 ****
--- 55,63 ----
  time error to applications that override the old method in a derived class 
  (wondering why it's no longer called ;-)
  
+ 
+ 
+ ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-07-11 08:40 -------
+ Sounds good to me. I will mark processingInstruction as well as startDTD final.
+ Let me know if any other code was broken.
+ Thanks!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to