Hi there, I'm replying 3 bugs at the same time, because they were reported by the same guy, and seem to be from the same schema. 2575: This bug should have been fixed in CVS. I tried your schema segment against the latest code, and got no error. 2576: I believe this one is invalid. You mentioned in the comment "What may be confusing the parser is that multiple elements in the child type (QueueEntry and Queue) map to a single element (ResponseTypeObj) (whose cardinality is 0..unbounded) in the parent type." But this does in fact violate the constraint "Particle Derivation OK", because of the definition of "complete �order-preserving� functional mapping" (http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#key-op). The word "follow" disallows two particles in the derived type to map to the same particle in the base type. (0..unbounded doesn't make unbounded number of particles. ResponseTypeObj is still one particle.) 2577: I copied your schema segment into a xsd file, added some trivial (type and element) declarations, but didn't get any cos-nonambig error. (I believe you bound "jdf" to some non-empty namespace, did you?) Could you try: 1. Get the latest code from CVS; or 2. Provide more information on how to reproduce the problem (a full schema with reasonable size would be good). Cheers, Sandy Gao Software Developer, IBM Canada (1-416) 448-3255 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
