PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=730

*** shadow/730  Fri Jul 20 13:15:28 2001
--- shadow/730.tmp.22003        Wed Aug  1 06:48:26 2001
***************
*** 7,13 ****
  |     Severity: Normal                   OS/Version: All                     |
  |     Priority: High                      Component: Core                    |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
! |  Assigned To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                  |
  |  Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                               |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |          URL:                                                              |
--- 7,13 ----
  |     Severity: Normal                   OS/Version: All                     |
  |     Priority: High                      Component: Core                    |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
! |  Assigned To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                           |
  |  Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                               |
  +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |          URL:                                                              |
***************
*** 93,95 ****
--- 93,109 ----
                fCharsOffset[chunk] = new int[INITIAL_CHUNK_SIZE];
                return true;
        }
+ 
+ ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2001-08-01 06:48 -------
+ I spoke with a JIT compiler developer on IBM's JDK's.  He indicated that (at 
+ least on IBM's JDK's), there were cases in which using try-catch could be more 
+ efficient than using the logically equivalent if-else, if exceptions didn't get 
+ thrown very often.
+ 
+ I've changed some instances in which if-else should be superior; in some cases 
+ in which try-catch would be better, I've instead tried to reduce the number of 
+ exceptions actually thrown, without increasing memory usage by too much.
+ 
+ The changes aren't complete, so I won't mark the bug as "FIXED", but I hope what 
+ I've done thus far improves the situation.  These changes are available in the 
+ Xerces-J 1.4.2.
\ No newline at end of file

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to