DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4760>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4760 Incorrect handling of "all" inheritance [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://http:// | Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-11-09 06:21 ------- I don't believe that this is a bug in how inheritence is handled for "all". If you see the follow-up note: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2001Nov/0100.html Jeni Tennison points out that the "All Group Limited" constraint prohibits the example cited in 0083.html. This issue comes up often enough, that I think the "XML Schema: Structures" recommendation needs to make the prohibition more explicit than it already is. I would suggest submitting it to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] for clarification. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
